⚠️ Important Legal Notice

This guide provides general information about FDA and FTC regulations for educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice. Always consult with qualified legal counsel for specific compliance questions regarding your products and marketing claims.

Marketing wellness products while staying compliant with FDA and FTC regulations can feel like navigating a minefield. Make one wrong claim, and you could face regulatory action, fines, or worse—damage to your brand's reputation and customer trust.

The wellness industry operates under a complex web of federal regulations that govern everything from product labeling to advertising claims. Understanding these rules isn't just about avoiding legal trouble—it's about building a sustainable business that customers can trust.

Understanding the Regulatory Landscape

Two primary federal agencies oversee wellness marketing: the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). They share jurisdiction through the FDA-FTC Liaison Agreement, with each agency focusing on different aspects of marketing compliance.

FDA vs. FTC: Who Regulates What

FDA Responsibilities
  • Product labeling and packaging
  • Product inserts and point-of-sale materials
  • Structure/function claims on labels
  • Nutritional labeling requirements
  • Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs)
FTC Responsibilities
  • All forms of advertising (print, digital, TV, radio)
  • Website claims and social media marketing
  • Influencer partnerships and testimonials
  • Email marketing and promotional materials
  • Substantiation evidence for advertising claims

Types of Legal Claims for Wellness Products

Understanding what you can and cannot claim is fundamental to compliant marketing. The FDA recognizes three main categories of allowable claims:

Claim Type What It Covers Requirements
Structure/Function Claims How a product affects normal body functions or structure FDA notification within 30 days, substantiation required, disclaimer required
Nutrient Content Claims Level of nutrients in the product (e.g., "high in vitamin C") Must meet FDA-defined criteria for specific nutrients
Health Claims Relationship between food/supplement and reduced disease risk Pre-approval by FDA required, very limited approved claims

Structure/Function Claims: The Safe Harbor

Most wellness brands rely on structure/function claims because they offer the most flexibility while remaining compliant. These claims describe how a product supports normal body functions without claiming to treat, cure, or prevent disease.

✅ Compliant Structure/Function Claims

"Supports immune system function"

"Helps maintain healthy energy levels"

"Promotes healthy digestion"

"Supports muscle recovery after exercise"

❌ Non-Compliant Disease Claims

"Cures arthritis pain"

"Prevents heart disease"

"Treats depression"

"Eliminates inflammation"

Required Disclaimers and Language

When making structure/function claims, the FDA requires specific disclaimer language to appear prominently on your labeling:

Required FDA Disclaimer: "This statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease."

Disclaimer Requirements

Substantiation Requirements: Proving Your Claims

Both the FDA and FTC require that you have evidence to support your marketing claims before you make them. This is called "prior substantiation," and it's one of the most critical aspects of compliance.

FTC Standard: Competent and Reliable Scientific Evidence

The FTC defines competent and reliable scientific evidence as tests, analyses, research, or studies that:

  1. Have been conducted and evaluated objectively by experts in the relevant field
  2. Are generally accepted in the profession to yield accurate and reliable results
Gold Standard: Randomized Controlled Trials

For health-related benefits, the FTC typically requires randomized, controlled human clinical testing. This means:

  • Human subjects (not just animal or in-vitro studies)
  • Randomized assignment to treatment and control groups
  • Blinded design when possible
  • Statistically significant results
  • Peer-reviewed publication preferred

Substantiation Factors

The level of substantiation required depends on several factors:

Common Compliance Mistakes to Avoid

Learning from others' mistakes can save your brand from costly regulatory issues. Here are the most common compliance pitfalls:

1. Inadequate Qualifying Language

Vague terms like "may help" or "supports" don't automatically make claims compliant if the underlying claim is still a disease claim.

❌ Still Non-Compliant

"May help reduce depression symptoms"

"Supports cancer recovery"

"Helps treat diabetes"

2. Relying on Testimonials and Surveys

The FTC considers consumer testimonials and surveys as anecdotal experiences that cannot adequately substantiate health-related claims. Even if you have thousands of positive reviews, this doesn't constitute scientific evidence.

3. Cherry-Picking Studies

Using only favorable studies while ignoring contradictory research violates substantiation requirements. Your evidence must represent the overall body of scientific research.

4. Making Claims Beyond Your Evidence

If your study tested a specific dosage or formulation, you cannot make claims about different products or dosages without additional evidence.

Digital Marketing Compliance

Online marketing presents unique compliance challenges. Every claim made on your website, social media, or in email marketing must meet the same standards as traditional advertising.

Website Compliance

Social Media Guidelines

Building a Compliance Program

Sustainable compliance requires systems and processes, not just one-time reviews. Here's how to build a robust compliance program:

1. Legal Review Process

2. Documentation Requirements

3. Ongoing Monitoring

Recent Regulatory Updates and Trends

2024-2025 Enforcement Trends

The FTC has increased enforcement activity significantly, with over $472 million in refunds to consumers in 2021 for deceptive marketing. In 2023, more than 700 beauty and personal care brands received warning letters about questionable marketing claims.

Updated "Healthy" Definition

The FDA has finalized updates to the "healthy" nutrient content claim, with an effective date of April 28, 2025. This affects how wellness brands can use "healthy" in their marketing and labeling.

Increased Scrutiny of Digital Claims

Regulators are paying closer attention to online marketing, including social media influencer partnerships, subscription models, and auto-ship programs.

Working with Legal Counsel

While this guide provides a foundation for understanding compliance requirements, working with experienced legal counsel is essential for:

💡 Pro Tip: Invest in compliance from the start. It's much more expensive to fix compliance problems after launch than to build compliant marketing from the beginning.

FDA and FTC compliance isn't just about avoiding regulatory trouble—it's about building a trustworthy brand that customers can rely on. By understanding the rules, investing in proper substantiation, and building robust compliance processes, wellness brands can market effectively while maintaining the trust that's essential for long-term success.

Remember: when in doubt, be conservative. It's better to make fewer claims that you can fully substantiate than to risk regulatory action with aggressive marketing that can't be proven.

Need Help with Compliant Customer Communication?

See how YapChat AI can help your wellness brand provide accurate, compliant sales assistance while building trust and driving conversions.

Get Your Demo